↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and Safety of Linagliptin in 2681 Asian Patients Stratified by Age, Obesity, and Renal Function: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Therapy, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and Safety of Linagliptin in 2681 Asian Patients Stratified by Age, Obesity, and Renal Function: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Published in
Advances in Therapy, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12325-017-0595-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guang Ning, Tushar Bandgar, Uwe Hehnke, Jisoo Lee, Juliana C. N. Chan

Abstract

Asian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are younger, leaner, and more likely to develop renal dysfunction than White populations. In this multiethnic analysis of data from phase 3 trials, we investigated the efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin in Asians stratified by these subphenotypes. Data from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluating linagliptin (as monotherapy, add-on therapy to metformin ± sulfonylurea, combined with pioglitazone or added to insulin) were pooled with efficacy data from 11 randomized trials of at least 24 weeks and safety data from 15 trials of various durations. In the efficacy set, 1404 Asian patients received linagliptin [mean (standard deviation) age 54.5 (10.1) years; body mass index (BMI) 26.0 (3.9) kg/m(2)] and 661 received placebo [age 55.0 (9.7) years; BMI 26.1 (3.9) kg/m(2)] with the same glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c): 8.2 (0.9)% in both groups. At 24 weeks, the placebo-corrected adjusted mean ± standard error change from baseline in HbA1c with linagliptin was -0.73 ± 0.04% (95% confidence interval -0.81, -0.65; P < 0.0001). Reductions in HbA1c were similar upon stratification by age [<65 years, -0.71 ± 0.05% (-0.80, -0.62; P < 0.0001); ≥65 years, -0.81 ± 0.10% (-1.01, -0.60; P < 0.0001)], BMI (<25 kg/m(2), -0.82 ± 0.06% [-0.94, -0.70; P < 0.0001]; ≥25 kg/m(2), -0.65 ± 0.06% [-0.76, -0.54; P < 0.0001]) and estimated glomerular filtration rate [<90 mL/min/1.73 m(2), -0.71 ± 0.06% (-0.82, -0.60; P < 0.0001); ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m(2), -0.75 ± 0.06% (-0.87, -0.64; P < 0.0001)]. In the safety set (linagliptin, n = 1842; placebo, n = 839), 52.2% and 54.6% of patients, respectively, experienced adverse events. The rates of drug-related adverse events were 10.9% in the linagliptin group and 10.4% in the placebo group. The respective rates of hypoglycemia were 8.3% and 9.5%, mainly among patients treated with sulfonylurea or insulin. Severe hypoglycemia was rare (<1.0% in either group). Linagliptin effectively reduced hyperglycemia in Asian patients with uncontrolled T2D, irrespective of age, BMI, renal function, or ethnic subgroups, and was well tolerated. Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, and the Diabetes Alliance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 33 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 40 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2017.
All research outputs
#18,569,430
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#1,670
of 2,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,368
of 318,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#25
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.