↓ Skip to main content

Current trends in the detection of peroxide-based explosives

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users
patent
5 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Current trends in the detection of peroxide-based explosives
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00216-009-2968-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raychelle M. Burks, David S. Hage

Abstract

The increased use of peroxide-based explosives (PBEs) in criminal and terrorist activity has created a demand for continued innovation in the detection of these agents. This review provides an update to a previous 2006 review on the detection of PBEs, with a focus in this report on luminescence and fluorescence methods, infrared and Raman spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and electrochemical techniques. Newer developments in gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography methods are also discussed. One recent trend that is discussed is an emphasis on field measurements through the use of portable instruments or portable assay formats. An increase in the use of infrared spectroscopy and mass spectrometry for PBE analysis is also noted. The analysis of triacetone triperoxide has been the focus in the development of many of these methods, although hexamethylene triperoxide diamine has received increased attention in PBE detection during the last few years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 41 53%
Engineering 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Chemical Engineering 3 4%
Physics and Astronomy 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,447,428
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#64
of 9,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,271
of 122,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,733 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.