| Title |
Analysis of bovine immunoglobulin G in milk, colostrum and dietary supplements: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-007-1391-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leyton W. Gapper, David E. J. Copestake, Don E. Otter, Harvey E. Indyk |
| Abstract |
The immunoprotective properties of bovine milk immunoglobulin G (IgG) have led to a recent proliferation of nutritional products incorporating this protein. It has therefore become critical that reliable analytical techniques for the measurement of the IgG content in such products are available. This literature review surveys current methods of analysis for IgG, including separation-based or immuno-based concentration analysis. The review also discusses nutraceutical applications, regulatory issues, stability of IgG and the significance of primary reference material in IgG analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 16% |
| Researcher | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 46 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 36% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 17 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 52 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,270,860
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,979
of 9,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,182
of 79,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#24
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.