↓ Skip to main content

Perspective of ions and messengers: an intricate link between potassium, glutamate, and cyclic di-AMP

Overview of attention for article published in Current Genetics, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Perspective of ions and messengers: an intricate link between potassium, glutamate, and cyclic di-AMP
Published in
Current Genetics, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00294-017-0734-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Gundlach, Fabian M. Commichau, Jörg Stülke

Abstract

Potassium and glutamate are the most abundant ions in every living cell. Whereas potassium plays a major role to keep the cellular turgor and to buffer the negative charges of the nucleic acids, the major function of glutamate is to serve as the universal amino group donor. In addition, both ions are involved in osmoprotection in bacterial cells. Here, we discuss how bacterial cells maintain the homeostasis of both ions and how adaptive evolution allows them to live even at extreme potassium limitation. Interestingly, positively charged amino acids are able to partially replace potassium, likely by buffering the negative charge of DNA. A major factor involved in the control of potassium homeostasis in Gram-positive bacteria is the essential second messenger cyclic di-AMP. This nucleotide is synthesized in response to the potassium concentration and in turn controls the expression and activity of potassium transporters. We discuss the link between the two major ions, DNA and the second messenger c-di-AMP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 8%
Chemistry 2 4%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#20,025,277
of 25,476,463 outputs
Outputs from Current Genetics
#966
of 1,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,637
of 326,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genetics
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,476,463 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,234 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.