↓ Skip to main content

The Madden–Julian oscillation in ECHAM4 coupled and uncoupled general circulation models

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Madden–Julian oscillation in ECHAM4 coupled and uncoupled general circulation models
Published in
Climate Dynamics, June 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00382-005-0026-3
Authors

Kenneth R. Sperber, Silvio Gualdi, Stephanie Legutke, Veronika Gayler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 32%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 68%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#7,444,500
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,003
of 4,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,087
of 56,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.