↓ Skip to main content

Climate change and Arctic ecosystems: 1. Vegetation changes north of 55°N between the last glacial maximum, mid‐Holocene, and present

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
275 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Climate change and Arctic ecosystems: 1. Vegetation changes north of 55°N between the last glacial maximum, mid‐Holocene, and present
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, October 2003
DOI 10.1029/2002jd002558
Authors

Nancy H. Bigelow, Linda B. Brubaker, Mary E. Edwards, Sandy P. Harrison, I. Colin Prentice, Patricia M. Anderson, Andrei A. Andreev, Patrick J. Bartlein, Torben R. Christensen, Wolfgang Cramer, Jed O. Kaplan, Anatoly V. Lozhkin, Nadja V. Matveyeva, David F. Murray, A. David McGuire, Volodya Y. Razzhivin, James C. Ritchie, Benjamin Smith, Donald A. Walker, Konrad Gajewski, Victoria Wolf, Björn H. Holmqvist, Yaeko Igarashi, Konstantin Kremenetskii, Aage Paus, Michael F. J. Pisaric, Valentina S. Volkova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 220 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 58 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 19%
Student > Master 32 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 7%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 30 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 82 34%
Environmental Science 56 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 19%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 31 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,722,734
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#1,411
of 14,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,883
of 57,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#13
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.