| Title |
Achieving Adequate Adaptation in Agriculture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, May 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-005-5942-z |
| Authors |
Ian Burton, Bo Lim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 39% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 27 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,637,030
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#909
of 6,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,346
of 70,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.