| Chapter title |
Regional Differences in the Carbon Source-Sink Potential of Natural Vegetation in the U.S.A.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Management, May 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00267-003-9115-4 |
| Authors |
Dominique Bachelet, Ronald P. Neilson, James M. Lenihan, Raymond J. Drapek |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 23 | 48% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#737
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,040
of 63,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.