↓ Skip to main content

Merits and Demerits of Vaccination for Patients with Neurological Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Juntendo Medical Journal, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 122)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Merits and Demerits of Vaccination for Patients with Neurological Diseases
Published in
Juntendo Medical Journal, January 2014
DOI 10.14789/jmj.60.s53
Authors

KAZUMASA YOKOYAMA, NOBUTAKA HATTORI

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,066,751
of 25,489,496 outputs
Outputs from Juntendo Medical Journal
#6
of 122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,087
of 319,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Juntendo Medical Journal
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,489,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.