↓ Skip to main content

The Elixhauser Comorbidity Method Outperforms the Charlson Index in Predicting Inpatient Death After Orthopaedic Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
401 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
Title
The Elixhauser Comorbidity Method Outperforms the Charlson Index in Predicting Inpatient Death After Orthopaedic Surgery
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11999-014-3686-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariano E. Menendez, Valentin Neuhaus, C. Niek van Dijk, David Ring

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 286 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 11%
Student > Master 24 8%
Other 24 8%
Other 57 20%
Unknown 81 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Computer Science 8 3%
Psychology 4 1%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 101 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,280,709
of 25,408,670 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#613
of 7,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,347
of 241,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#9
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,408,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.