| Title |
UV-radiation versus grazing pressure: long-term floating of kelp rafts (Macrocystis pyrifera) is facilitated by efficient photoacclimation but undermined by grazing losses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-010-1547-9 |
| Authors |
Eva Rothäusler, Iván Gómez, Ulf Karsten, Fadia Tala, Martin Thiel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,538,395
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,241
of 3,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,518
of 99,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.