You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Endovascular Therapies for Peripheral Arterial Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, November 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circulationaha.106.621391 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher J. White, William A. Gray |
| Abstract |
Peripheral arterial disease is one manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis. The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease increases with the age of the population. It is important to remember the significant association of coincident coronary artery disease, which is the major cause of mortality in these patients. Remarkable technological advances in the past decade, along with patient preference, have shifted revascularization strategies from traditional open surgical approaches toward lower-morbidity percutaneous endovascular treatments. The availability of stents, more than any other advance, has fueled the growth of catheter-based procedures by improving the safety, durability, and predictability of percutaneous revascularization. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 77 | 78% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 77 | 78% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,444,500
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#11,101
of 19,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,095
of 77,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#69
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.