↓ Skip to main content

Utility of Conventional Electrocardiographic Criteria in Patients With Idiopathic Ventricular Tachycardia

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
54 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Utility of Conventional Electrocardiographic Criteria in Patients With Idiopathic Ventricular Tachycardia
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, April 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.01.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anil V. Yadav, Babak Nazer, Barbara J. Drew, John M. Miller, Hicham El Masry, William J. Groh, Andrea Natale, Nassir Marrouche, Nitish Badhwar, Yanfei Yang, Melvin M. Scheinman

Abstract

This study sought to determine the ability of conventional electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria to correctly differentiate idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) from supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with aberrancy. Previously reported VT ECG criteria were developed from cohorts of patients with structural heart disease and have not been applied to patients with idiopathic VT. ECGs of 115 idiopathic VTs, 101 post-myocardial infarction (MI) VTs, and 111 wide QRS SVTs were analyzed using standard criteria. VT was diagnosed in patients when at least 1 criterion was met, SVT when no criteria were met, and indeterminate when there were conflicting criteria. Standard ECG criteria more frequently diagnosed VT in the post-MI group than the idiopathic group (95% vs. 82%, respectively; p < 0.01). Diagnosis in only 12 of the 111 SVT patients (11%) met the criteria for VT. All patients in the idiopathic VT group with right branch bundle block morphology who did not meet VT criteria demonstrated an rsR' pattern in V1 (consistent with SVT). Among idiopathic VT patients, Purkinje-associated VT had the lowest sensitivity for correct VT diagnosis in 13 of 23 patients (57%), septal sites of origin were correctly diagnosed in only 56 of 76 patients (74%), whereas nonseptal sites had a high sensitivity in 35 of 35 patients (100%; p < 0.005). Conventional ECG criteria have reduced sensitivity to distinguish VT from SVT with aberrancy in patients with idiopathic VT. This is most pronounced in VT originating from septal sites, particularly Purkinje sites and the septal outflow tract regions. Clinicians should be aware that application of conventional ECG criteria in idiopathic VT may underdiagnose VT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 33%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,240,382
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#246
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,264
of 323,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#8
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.