↓ Skip to main content

A Practical Guide for Calculating Indirect Costs of Disease

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
6 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
286 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
A Practical Guide for Calculating Indirect Costs of Disease
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00019053-199610050-00003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc A. Koopmanschap, Frans F. H. Rutten

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Other 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 23%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 15%
Psychology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,981,275
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#136
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,332
of 285,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#8
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.