| Title |
Does analysis using “last observation carried forward” introduce bias in dementia research?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.080820 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frank J Molnar, Brian Hutton, Dean Fergusson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 56% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 23% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 30% |
| Psychology | 11 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 23% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,418,449
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,838
of 9,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,883
of 84,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#11
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.