You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving Aboriginal maternal and infant health services in the ‘Top End’ of Australia; synthesis of the findings of a health services research program aimed at engaging stakeholders, developing research capacity and embedding change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-241 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lesley Barclay, Sue Kruske, Sarah Bar-Zeev, Malinda Steenkamp, Cathryn Josif, Concepta Wulili Narjic, Molly Wardaguga, Suzanne Belton, Yu Gao, Terry Dunbar, Sue Kildea |
| Abstract |
Health services research is a well-articulated research methodology and can be a powerful vehicle to implement sustainable health service reform. This paper presents a summary of a five-year collaborative program between stakeholders and researchers that led to sustainable improvements in the maternity services for remote-dwelling Aboriginal women and their infants in the Top End (TE) of Australia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 19% |
| Researcher | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Librarian | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 10% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,940,716
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,405
of 7,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,300
of 227,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#50
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.