↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in improving psychological outcomes for heart transplant recipients: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in improving psychological outcomes for heart transplant recipients: A systematic review
Published in
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, January 2014
DOI 10.1177/1474515113519519
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron Conway, Verena Schadewaldt, Robyn Clark, Chantal Ski, David R Thompson, Kathryn Kynoch, Lynn Doering

Abstract

Post-heart transplant psychological distress may directly hinder physiological health as well as indirectly impact on clinical outcomes by increasing unhealthy behaviors, such as immunosuppression non-adherence. Reducing psychological distress for heart transplant recipients is therefore vitally important in order to improve not only patients' overall health and well-being but also clinical outcomes, such as morbidity and mortality. Evidence from other populations suggests that non-pharmacological interventions may be an effective strategy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 157 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 17%
Psychology 23 14%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 39 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,673,538
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#410
of 839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,507
of 308,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.