↓ Skip to main content

Hydration reaction characteristics of CaO from various local limestone samples as Chemical heat pump/storage materials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Hydration reaction characteristics of CaO from various local limestone samples as Chemical heat pump/storage materials
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10853-017-1311-3
Authors

H. Zhang, H. Ogura, M. Umezu, T. Imai, M. Ishii

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Unspecified 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 11%
Unspecified 1 11%
Chemistry 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2017.
All research outputs
#18,569,430
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#3,969
of 4,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,337
of 315,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#25
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.