↓ Skip to main content

A Meta-Analysis of Quality-of-Life Estimates for Stroke

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
A Meta-Analysis of Quality-of-Life Estimates for Stroke
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00019053-200321030-00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tammy O. Tengs, Ting H. Lin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 26%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 6 7%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 30%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 13%
Psychology 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 26 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,863,762
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#247
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,910
of 189,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#31
of 549 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 549 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.