| Title |
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for IgA nephropathy 2014
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10157-015-1223-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yukio Yuzawa, Ryohei Yamamoto, Kazuo Takahashi, Ritsuko Katafuchi, Makoto Tomita, Yoshihide Fujigaki, Hiroshi Kitamura, Masashi Goto, Takashi Yasuda, Mitsuhiro Sato, Maki Urushihara, Shuji Kondo, Shoji Kagami, Yoshinari Yasuda, Hiroyuki Komatsu, Miki Takahara, Yasuaki Harabuchi, Kenjiro Kimura, Seiichi Matsuo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 44% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,426,857
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#70
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,916
of 301,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.