↓ Skip to main content

Dietary Trans Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Past and Present

Overview of attention for article published in Current Atherosclerosis Reports, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Dietary Trans Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Past and Present
Published in
Current Atherosclerosis Reports, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11883-014-0433-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice H. Lichtenstein

Abstract

Dietary trans double bond containing fatty acids have been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. There are two main sources of dietary trans fatty acids: meat and dairy fats, and partially hydrogenated fats. Because of a number of factors, including changes in federal labeling requirements for packaged foods, and local bans and grassroots pressure on the use of partially hydrogenated fat, trans fat intake has declined in recent years. Similar to saturated fatty acids, trans fatty acids increase plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol concentrations. In contrast to saturated fatty acids, trans fatty acids do not increase high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol concentrations. These differences have been attributed to lipoprotein catabolic rate rather than production rate. When reported, effects of partially hydrogenated fat on glucose homeostasis, C-reactive protein, blood pressure, and LDL oxidation are modest. Although at this time some issues remain unresolved regarding trans fatty acids and CVD risk factors other than plasma lipoprotein concentrations, they should not affect the final dietary recommendation to limit intake.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 18%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Chemistry 6 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,104,635
of 24,457,056 outputs
Outputs from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#54
of 823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,929
of 233,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,457,056 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them