| Title |
The anuran calling repertoire in the light of social context
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
acta ethologica, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10211-014-0194-4 |
| Authors |
Luís F. Toledo, Itamar A. Martins, Daniel P. Bruschi, Michel A. Passos, César Alexandre, Célio F. B. Haddad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 7 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Researcher | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 68 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 132 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 77 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#14,056,242
of 24,214,995 outputs
Outputs from acta ethologica
#127
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,688
of 232,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from acta ethologica
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,214,995 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.