↓ Skip to main content

Nutrients, Clock Genes, and Chrononutrition

Overview of attention for article published in Current Nutrition Reports, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 383)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
56 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
454 Mendeley
Title
Nutrients, Clock Genes, and Chrononutrition
Published in
Current Nutrition Reports, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13668-014-0082-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hideaki Oike, Katsutaka Oishi, Masuko Kobori

Abstract

Circadian clocks that comprise clock genes exist throughout the body and control daily physiological events. The central clock that dominates activity rhythms is entrained by light/dark cycles, whereas peripheral clocks regulating local metabolic rhythms are determined by feeding/fasting cycles. Nutrients reset peripheral circadian clocks and the local clock genes control downstream metabolic processes. Metabolic states also affect the clockworks in feedback manners. Because the circadian system organizes whole energy homeostasis, including food intake, fat accumulation, and caloric expenditure, the disruption of circadian clocks leads to metabolic disorders. Recent findings show that time-restricted feeding during the active phase amplifies circadian clocks and improves metabolic disorders induced by a high-fat diet without caloric reduction, whereas unusual/irregular food intake induces various metabolic dysfunctions. Such evidence from nutrition studies that consider circadian system (chrononutrition) has rapidly accumulated. We review molecular relationships between circadian clocks and nutrition as well as recent chrononutrition findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 454 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 441 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 77 17%
Student > Master 68 15%
Researcher 41 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 9%
Other 23 5%
Other 75 17%
Unknown 129 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 10%
Neuroscience 18 4%
Other 55 12%
Unknown 155 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#510,729
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from Current Nutrition Reports
#26
of 383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,418
of 241,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Nutrition Reports
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them