↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of life span by the gut microbiota in the short-lived African turquoise killifish

Overview of attention for article published in eLife, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
316 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
444 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulation of life span by the gut microbiota in the short-lived African turquoise killifish
Published in
eLife, August 2017
DOI 10.7554/elife.27014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Smith, David Willemsen, Miriam Popkes, Franziska Metge, Edson Gandiwa, Martin Reichard, Dario Riccardo Valenzano

Abstract

Gut bacteria occupy the interface between the organism and the external environment, contributing to homeostasis and disease. Yet, the causal role of the gut microbiota during host aging is largely unexplored. Here, using the African turquoise killifish (Nothobranchius furzeri), a naturally short-lived vertebrate, we show that the gut microbiota plays a key role in modulating vertebrate life span. Recolonizing the gut of middle-age individuals with bacteria from young donors resulted in life span extension and delayed behavioral decline. This intervention prevented the decrease in microbial diversity associated with host aging and maintained a young-like gut bacterial community, characterized by overrepresentation of the key genera Exiguobacterium, Planococcus, Propionigenium and Psychrobacter. Our findings demonstrate that the natural microbial gut community of young individuals can causally induce long-lasting beneficial systemic effects that lead to life span extension in a vertebrate model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 167 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 442 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 16%
Student > Bachelor 68 15%
Researcher 67 15%
Student > Master 51 11%
Student > Postgraduate 21 5%
Other 64 14%
Unknown 102 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 119 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 28 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 5%
Neuroscience 14 3%
Other 47 11%
Unknown 114 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 201. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#198,189
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from eLife
#434
of 15,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,194
of 326,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eLife
#16
of 407 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 407 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.