| Title |
Patients' and healthcare professionals' views of cancer follow-up: systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp09x453576 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth A Lewis, Richard D Neal, Maggie Hendry, Barbara France, Nefyn H Williams, Daphne Russell, Dyfrig A Hughes, Ian Russell, Nicholas S A Stuart, David Weller, Clare Wilkinson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 23% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,165,214
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,630
of 4,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,671
of 109,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.