↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of Optimal Outcome in Toddlers Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Predictors of Optimal Outcome in Toddlers Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10803-006-0340-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saasha Sutera, Juhi Pandey, Emma L. Esser, Michael A. Rosenthal, Leandra B. Wilson, Marianne Barton, James Green, Sarah Hodgson, Diana L. Robins, Thyde Dumont-Mathieu, Deborah Fein

Abstract

A diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is usually taken to be permanent. In this study, 13 two-year-old children with ASD lost the diagnosis by age 4, at which time they scored within the normal range on standardized measures of cognitive and adaptive functioning. No differences were found in symptom severity, socialization, or communication between children who lost the ASD diagnosis and children who did not, but children with PDD-NOS were significantly more likely than those with full autistic disorder to move off the spectrum. The clearest distinguishing factor was motor skills at age 2. Results support the idea that some toddlers with ASD can lose their diagnosis and suggest that this is difficult to predict.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 256 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 16%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 60 23%
Unknown 51 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 89 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 11%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Neuroscience 10 4%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 67 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,826,795
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,227
of 5,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,709
of 164,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.