↓ Skip to main content

Functional validation of ATF4 and GADD34 in Neuro2a cells by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Functional validation of ATF4 and GADD34 in Neuro2a cells by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11010-017-3156-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kentaro Oh-hashi, Naoki Sugiura, Fumimasa Amaya, Ken-ichi Isobe, Yoko Hirata

Abstract

Activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), which is ubiquitously expressed, plays a crucial role in regulating various stress-responsive genes under pathophysiological conditions. Further, growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible gene 34 (GADD34), a downstream target of ATF4, has been reported to negatively regulate ATF4 expression. To understand the relationship between intrinsic ATF4 and GADD34 under resting and ER stress conditions, we used a novel gene editing approach, CRISPR/Cas9, to integrate antibiotic-resistant genes into the target genes, ATF4 and GADD34. First, we manipulated the ATF4 gene in the mouse neuroblastoma cell line, Neuro2a, and compared the ER stress responses between parental and ATF4-edited Neuro2a cells. Next, we established Neuro2a cells with edited GADD34 and ATF4/GADD34 genes and found that ATF4 acts as a proapoptotic factor, but GADD34 depletion did not attenuate the expression of cleaved caspase-3 induced by tunicamycin treatment. These findings provide new insights into the ATF4 signaling cascades. Additionally, the rapid establishment of cells lacking multiple genes using this CRISPR/Cas9 system will be a powerful tool for exploring various cellular issues under pathophysiological conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Other 3 12%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,477,045
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#1,332
of 2,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,364
of 319,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#10
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.