| Title |
A meta-analysis of FDG-PET for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10549-004-3291-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carmen R. Isasi, Renee M. Moadel, M. Donald Blaufox |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 48% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#3,267,491
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#553
of 4,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,060
of 59,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.