↓ Skip to main content

Bioactivity of Mango Flesh and Peel Extracts on Peroxisome Proliferator‐Activated Receptor γ[PPARγ] Activation and MCF‐7 Cell Proliferation: Fraction and Fruit Variability

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Food Science, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioactivity of Mango Flesh and Peel Extracts on Peroxisome Proliferator‐Activated Receptor γ[PPARγ] Activation and MCF‐7 Cell Proliferation: Fraction and Fruit Variability
Published in
Journal of Food Science, November 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01899.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashley S. Wilkinson, Bernadine M. Flanagan, Jean‐Thomas Pierson, Amitha K. Hewavitharana, Ralf G. Dietzgen, P. Nicholas Shaw, Sarah J. Roberts‐Thomson, Gregory R. Monteith, Michael J. Gidley

Abstract

Mangos are a source of bioactive compounds with potential health promoting activity. Biological activities associated with mango fractions were assessed in cell-based assays to develop effective extraction and fractionation methodologies and to define sources of variability. Two techniques were developed for extraction and fractionation of mango fruit peel and flesh. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was used to assess compositional differences between mango fractions in flesh extracts. Many of the extracts were effective in inhibiting the proliferation of human breast cancer cells in vitro. All fractions showed bioactivity in PPAR activation assays, but quantitative responses showed marked fruit-to-fruit variability, highlighting the need to bulk fruit prior to extraction for activity-guided fractionation of bioactive components. This study also suggests that combinations of diverse molecular components may be responsible for cell-level bioactivities from mango fractions, and that purification and activity profiling of individual components may be difficult to relate to whole fruit effects. Practical Application: Although the health benefits of fruits are strongly indicated from studies of diet and disease, it is not known what role individual fruit types can play, particularly for tropical fruits. This study shows that there is a diversity of potentially beneficial bioactivities within the flesh and peel of mango fruit, although fruit-to-fruit variation can be large. The results add to the evidence that the food approach of eating all components of fruits is likely to be more beneficial to health than consuming refined extracts, as the purification process would inevitably remove components with beneficial bioactivities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 9 26%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2011.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Food Science
#3,980
of 5,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,324
of 188,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Food Science
#26
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.