↓ Skip to main content

Biotechnological production of erythritol and its applications

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
patent
13 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
Title
Biotechnological production of erythritol and its applications
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00253-010-2496-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hee-Jung Moon, Marimuthu Jeya, In-Won Kim, Jung-Kul Lee

Abstract

Erythritol, a four-carbon polyol, is a biological sweetener with applications in food and pharmaceutical industries. It is also used as a functional sugar substitute in special foods for people with diabetes and obesity because of its unique nutritional properties. Erythritol is produced by microbial methods using mostly osmophilic yeasts and has been produced commercially using mutant strains of Aureobasidium sp. and Pseudozyma tsukubaensis. Due to the high yield and productivity in the industrial scale of production, erythritol serves as an inexpensive starting material for the production of other sugars. This review focuses on the approaches for the efficient erythritol production, strategies used to enhance erythritol productivity in microbes, and the potential biotechnological applications of erythritol.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 257 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 13%
Student > Master 35 13%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 78 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 17%
Engineering 16 6%
Chemistry 16 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 87 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,385,951
of 25,002,811 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#74
of 8,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,624
of 99,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,002,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.