↓ Skip to main content

Bladder, Bowel and Sexual Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Bladder, Bowel and Sexual Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
Drugs, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00003495-200363020-00003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ranan DasGupta, Clare J. Fowler

Abstract

Although patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are likely to have problems with bladder, bowel and sexual function, these problems have often been neglected in the past. Bladder dysfunction produces symptoms of urgency, frequency and urge incontinence (due to bladder overactivity and incomplete emptying), and is found in up to 75% of patients with MS. The mainstay of drug treatment for neurogenic bladder overactivity is anticholinergic medication, although intravesical treatments have also been proposed, such as the vanilloids and botulinum toxin, as well as sublingual cannibanoids. There has been much progress with pro-erectile agents in recent years, notably the use of sildenafil citrate, which has been shown to be particularly efficacious in these patients. Other agents include apomorphine hydrochloride and newer phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors; however, the efficacy of these drugs in patients with MS remains to be proven. Research in female sexual dysfunction is also progressing, although this aspect of patient well being has only recently been addressed; the reported development of a classification system for the condition is likely to help categorise future treatments. Unlike bladder and sexual dysfunction, there have been rather limited advances in the treatment of faecal incontinence and constipation specifically for patients with MS, despite a prevalence of up to 50%. This review highlights the strategies for these types dysfunction commonly seen in patients with MS, with report of recent pharmacological developments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 44 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 32%
Psychology 10 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 44 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#833
of 3,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,054
of 189,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#278
of 1,461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.