↓ Skip to main content

Considerations for Research and Development of Culturally Relevant Mindfulness Interventions in American Minority Communities

Overview of attention for article published in Mindfulness, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Considerations for Research and Development of Culturally Relevant Mindfulness Interventions in American Minority Communities
Published in
Mindfulness, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12671-017-0785-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey Proulx, Raina Croff, Barry Oken, Carolyn M. Aldwin, Crystal Fleming, Dessa Bergen-Cico, Thao Le, Misbah Noorani

Abstract

As many health disparities in American minority communities (AMCs) are stress-related, there has been an increased interest in the development of mindfulness programs as potential stress reduction measures in these communities. However, the bulk of the extant literature on mindfulness research and mindfulness interventions is based upon experiences with the larger White community. The intent of this commentary is to share a framework that includes key cultural considerations for conducting research and developing culturally-salient mindfulness programs with AMCs. We build on our experiences and the experiences of other researchers who have explored mindfulness in African and Native American communities; in particular, we examine issues around community outreach with an emphatic gesture toward emphasizing protection of AMCs and their participants. Discussed are considerations with respect to attitudinal foundations in mindfulness-based research and program development with these communities. However, the overall message of this paper is not to provide a "to-do" list of research steps, but to rather, encourage researchers to turn inward and consider the development of skillful characteristics that will increase the likelihood of a successful research venture while also protecting the cultural traditions of the AMC of interest.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 12%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 36 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 36%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Arts and Humanities 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 44 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,714,469
of 24,703,339 outputs
Outputs from Mindfulness
#183
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,787
of 292,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mindfulness
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,703,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.