↓ Skip to main content

Irisin and FNDC5: effects of 12-week strength training, and relations to muscle phenotype and body mass composition in untrained women

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Irisin and FNDC5: effects of 12-week strength training, and relations to muscle phenotype and body mass composition in untrained women
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00421-014-2922-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Ellefsen, O. Vikmoen, G. Slettaløkken, J. E. Whist, H. Nygaard, I. Hollan, I. Rauk, G. Vegge, T. A. Strand, T. Raastad, B. R. Rønnestad

Abstract

To investigate the effects of strength training on abundances of irisin-related biomarkers in skeletal muscle and blood of untrained young women, and their associations with body mass composition, muscle phenotype and levels of thyroid hormones.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iraq 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 117 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 20%
Student > Master 19 15%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 33 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 25 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 36 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,350,121
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,878
of 4,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,393
of 243,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#30
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.