↓ Skip to main content

Restoration of pharyngeal dilator muscle force in dystrophin‐deficient (mdx) mice following co‐treatment with neutralizing interleukin‐6 receptor antibodies and urocortin 2

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Physiology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Restoration of pharyngeal dilator muscle force in dystrophin‐deficient (mdx) mice following co‐treatment with neutralizing interleukin‐6 receptor antibodies and urocortin 2
Published in
Experimental Physiology, August 2017
DOI 10.1113/ep086232
Pubmed ID
Authors

David P. Burns, Jane Rowland, Leonie Canavan, Kevin H. Murphy, Molly Brannock, Dervla O'Malley, Ken D. O'Halloran, Deirdre Edge

Abstract

The mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) shows evidence of impaired pharyngeal dilator muscle function. We hypothesised that inflammatory and stress-related factors are implicated in airway dilator muscle dysfunction. Six week old mdx (n = 26) and wild-type (WT; n = 26) mice received either saline (0.9% w v(-1) ) or a co-administration of neutralising IL-6 receptor antibodies (xIL-6R; 0.2 mg kg(-1) ) and corticotrophin releasing factor receptor 2 agonist (Urocortin 2; 30 μg kg(-1) ) over 2 weeks. Sternohyoid muscle isometric and isotonic contractile function was examined ex vivo. Muscle fibre centronucleation, and muscle cellular infiltration, collagen content, fibre type distribution and fibre cross-sectional area were determined by histology and immunofluorescence. Muscle chemokine content was examined by use of a multiplex assay. Sternohyoid peak specific force at 100 Hz was significantly reduced in mdx compared with WT. Drug treatment completely restored force in mdx sternohyoid to WT levels. The percentage of centrally-nucleated muscle fibres was significantly increased in mdx and this was partially ameliorated following drug treatment. The areal density of infiltrates and collagen content were significantly increased in mdx sternohyoid; both indices were unaffected by drug treatment. The abundance of MHC type IIb fibres was significantly decreased in mdx sternohyoid; drug treatment preserved MHC type IIb complement in mdx muscle. The chemokines MIP-2, IP-10 and MIP-3α were significantly increased in mdx sternohyoid compared with WT. Drug treatment significantly increased chemokine expression in mdx but not WT. Recovery of contractile function was impressive in our study with implications for DMD. The precise molecular mechanisms by which the drug treatment exerts an inotropic effect on mdx sternohyoid muscle remains to be elucidated. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Computer Science 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 13 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#20,726,252
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Physiology
#2,286
of 2,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,416
of 327,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Physiology
#43
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.