↓ Skip to main content

B7-H1 signaling is integrated during CD8+ T cell priming and restrains effector differentiation

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
B7-H1 signaling is integrated during CD8+ T cell priming and restrains effector differentiation
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00262-014-1563-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel M. Gibbons, Xin Liu, Susan M. Harrington, Christopher J. Krco, Eugene D. Kwon, Haidong Dong

Abstract

A promising strategy in tumor immunotherapy is the use of activated dendritic cells as vehicles for tumor vaccines with the goal of activating anti-tumor T cell responses. Current formulations for dendritic cell-based immunotherapies have limited effects on patient survival, providing motivation for further investigation of ways to enhance dendritic cell priming of anti-tumor T cell responses. Using a brief in vitro priming model, we have found that B7-H1 expressed by activated dendritic cells is integrated during priming of naïve CD8(+) T cells and functions to limit the differentiation of effector T cell responses. CD8(+) T cells primed by B7-H1-deficient dendritic cells exhibit increased production of IFN-γ, enhanced target cell killing, and improved anti-tumor activity. Additionally, enhanced memory populations arise from CD8(+) T cells primed by B7-H1-deficient dendritic cells. Based on these findings, we suggest that early blockade of B7-H1 signaling should be investigated as a strategy to improve dendritic cell-based anti-tumor immunotherapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Psychology 1 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2014.
All research outputs
#13,826,113
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#1,941
of 2,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,486
of 229,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#16
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.