| Title |
A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.090523 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin E Thorpe, Merrick Zwarenstein, Andrew D Oxman, Shaun Treweek, Curt D Furberg, Douglas G Altman, Sean Tunis, Eduardo Bergel, Ian Harvey, David J Magid, Kalipso Chalkidou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 31 | 22% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,940,633
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#2,278
of 8,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,056
of 78,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#14
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.