You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
「にんにく卵黄」による薬剤性肺障害と考えられた1例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.18907/jjsre.38.2_118 |
| Authors |
鈴木 慎太郎, 田中 明彦, 岸野（大木） 康成, 村田 泰規, 楠本 壮二郎, 石田 博雄, 安藤 浩一, 白井 崇生, 大西 司, 相良 博典, 瀧本 雅文 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 25% |
| Unknown | 12 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,736,085
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy
#3
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,728
of 313,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one scored the same or higher as 34 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.