↓ Skip to main content

Arsenic Speciation in Australian-Grown and Imported Rice on Sale in Australia: Implications for Human Health Risk

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Arsenic Speciation in Australian-Grown and Imported Rice on Sale in Australia: Implications for Human Health Risk
Published in
Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry, June 2014
DOI 10.1021/jf501077w
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Azizur Rahman, Mohammad Mahmudur Rahman, Suzie M. Reichman, Richard P. Lim, Ravi Naidu

Abstract

Rice is an important route of arsenic (As) exposure to human, especially the populations with rice-based diets. Human health risk of As varies greatly with rice variety and country of origin. The purpose of the present study was to determine total and speciated As in Australian grown and imported rice on sale in Australia to assess their health risk to the consumers. The total As (tAs) concentrations in Australian grown organic brown, medium grain brown, and organic white rice were 438±23, 287±03 and 283±18 µg kg-1 dry weight (d. wt.), respectively. In Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani, and Thai rice imported and on sale in Australia, tAs concentrations were 56±05, 92±10, 82±06 and 172±24 µg kg-1, respectively. Asian rice contained mainly inorganic As (iAs; 86-99%), while 18-26% of the tAs in Australian grown rice was dimethylarsinic acid (DMA). Relatively higher concentration of tAs in Australian grown rice than imported rice of Asian origin suggests that Australian rice may be a health risk for the consumers. It was estimated that Australian grown organic brown rice can contribute up to 98% of the FAO/WHO recommended maximum tolerable daily intake limit of iAs (2.1 µg kg-1 body wt. day-1) for Asian immigrants. However, other Australian consumers including the European immigrants unlikely to have health risk of As from rice diets due to their lower rice consumption rates than the Asian immigrants. The risk assessment showed that imported rice on sale in Australia was likely to pose lower health risk to consumers than Australian grown rice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 25%
Environmental Science 8 12%
Chemistry 6 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,997,872
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry
#5,801
of 19,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,739
of 242,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry
#53
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.