↓ Skip to main content

Blood-typing as a Pseudo-personality Theory and Diversity of Its Explanatory Styles

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Personality, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blood-typing as a Pseudo-personality Theory and Diversity of Its Explanatory Styles
Published in
Japanese Journal of Personality, January 2006
DOI 10.2132/personality.15.33
Authors

Akihiro Uemura, Tatsuya Sato

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Personality
#62
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,326
of 174,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Personality
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.