↓ Skip to main content

Saving Human Lives: What Complexity Science and Information Systems can Contribute

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Statistical Physics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 2,067)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
67 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
490 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
360 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Saving Human Lives: What Complexity Science and Information Systems can Contribute
Published in
Journal of Statistical Physics, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10955-014-1024-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk Helbing, Dirk Brockmann, Thomas Chadefaux, Karsten Donnay, Ulf Blanke, Olivia Woolley-Meza, Mehdi Moussaid, Anders Johansson, Jens Krause, Sebastian Schutte, Matjaž Perc

Abstract

We discuss models and data of crowd disasters, crime, terrorism, war and disease spreading to show that conventional recipes, such as deterrence strategies, are often not effective and sufficient to contain them. Many common approaches do not provide a good picture of the actual system behavior, because they neglect feedback loops, instabilities and cascade effects. The complex and often counter-intuitive behavior of social systems and their macro-level collective dynamics can be better understood by means of complexity science. We highlight that a suitable system design and management can help to stop undesirable cascade effects and to enable favorable kinds of self-organization in the system. In such a way, complexity science can help to save human lives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 4 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 340 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 25%
Researcher 45 13%
Student > Master 36 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Professor 18 5%
Other 74 21%
Unknown 77 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 46 13%
Social Sciences 35 10%
Engineering 30 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 7%
Physics and Astronomy 23 6%
Other 107 30%
Unknown 95 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#664,888
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Statistical Physics
#8
of 2,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,997
of 242,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Statistical Physics
#1
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,067 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.