↓ Skip to main content

Sex Differences in Visual Attention to Erotic and Non-Erotic Stimuli

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Sex Differences in Visual Attention to Erotic and Non-Erotic Stimuli
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, August 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10508-007-9208-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy D. Lykins, Marta Meana, Gregory P. Strauss

Abstract

It has been suggested that sex differences in the processing of erotic material (e.g., memory, genital arousal, brain activation patterns) may also be reflected by differential attention to visual cues in erotic material. To test this hypothesis, we presented 20 heterosexual men and 20 heterosexual women with erotic and non-erotic images of heterosexual couples and tracked their eye movements during scene presentation. Results supported previous findings that erotic and non-erotic information was visually processed in a different manner by both men and women. Men looked at opposite sex figures significantly longer than did women, and women looked at same sex figures significantly longer than did men. Within-sex analyses suggested that men had a strong visual attention preference for opposite sex figures as compared to same sex figures, whereas women appeared to disperse their attention evenly between opposite and same sex figures. These differences, however, were not limited to erotic images but evidenced in non-erotic images as well. No significant sex differences were found for attention to the contextual region of the scenes. Results were interpreted as potentially supportive of recent studies showing a greater non-specificity of sexual arousal in women. This interpretation assumes there is an erotic valence to images of the sex to which one orients, even when the image is not explicitly erotic. It also assumes a relationship between visual attention and erotic valence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Finland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 158 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 23%
Student > Master 20 12%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 22 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 88 54%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 28 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,943,081
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#943
of 3,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,771
of 69,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.