↓ Skip to main content

Animals, Zombanimals, and the Total Turing Test

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Logic, Language and Information, October 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Animals, Zombanimals, and the Total Turing Test
Published in
Journal of Logic, Language and Information, October 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1008311207953
Authors

Selmer Bringsjord, Clarke Caporale, Ron Noel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Master 4 18%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 18%
Computer Science 4 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 9%
Psychology 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2014.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Logic, Language and Information
#96
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,592
of 38,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Logic, Language and Information
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.