↓ Skip to main content

The relationship between motivation, monetary compensation, and data quality among US- and India-based workers on Mechanical Turk

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
Title
The relationship between motivation, monetary compensation, and data quality among US- and India-based workers on Mechanical Turk
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, June 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13428-014-0483-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leib Litman, Jonathan Robinson, Cheskie Rosenzweig

Abstract

In this study, we examined data quality among Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) workers based in India, and the effect of monetary compensation on their data quality. Recent studies have shown that work quality is independent of compensation rates, and that compensation primarily affects the quantity but not the quality of work. However, the results of these studies were generally based on compensation rates below the minimum wage, and far below a level that was likely to play a practical role in the lives of workers. In this study, compensation rates were set around the minimum wage in India. To examine data quality, we developed the squared discrepancy procedure, which is a task-based quality assurance approach for survey tasks whose goal is to identify inattentive participants. We showed that data quality is directly affected by compensation rates for India-based participants. We also found that data were of a lesser quality among India-based than among US participants, even when optimal payment strategies were utilized. We additionally showed that the motivation of MTurk users has shifted, and that monetary compensation is now reported to be the primary reason for working on MTurk, among both US- and India-based workers. Overall, MTurk is a constantly evolving marketplace where multiple factors can contribute to data quality. High-quality survey data can be acquired on MTurk among India-based participants when an appropriate pay rate is provided and task-specific quality assurance procedures are utilized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 229 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 24%
Student > Master 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Researcher 12 5%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 52 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 34 14%
Social Sciences 23 10%
Computer Science 17 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 6%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 66 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,320,498
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#249
of 2,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,526
of 244,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.