↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of silver diamine fluoride: Effectiveness and application in older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Gerodontology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 474)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of silver diamine fluoride: Effectiveness and application in older adults
Published in
Gerodontology, August 2017
DOI 10.1111/ger.12294
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amruta D. Hendre, George W. Taylor, Elisa M. Chávez, Susan Hyde

Abstract

This systematic review examines the effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) in the management of caries in older adults. Silver diamine fluoride has been extensively researched and proven effective for caries prevention and arrest in children. Limited studies support its effectiveness in adult and older adult populations. Multiple databases were searched according to specified inclusion-exclusion criteria. Quality assessment used modified Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine worksheets. Three randomised controlled trials were identified that addressed the effectiveness of SDF on root caries in older adults, but none addressed coronal caries. Root caries prevented fraction and arrest rate for SDF were significantly higher than placebo. The prevented fraction for caries prevention for SDF compared to placebo was 71% in a 3-year study and 25% in a 2-year study. The prevented fraction for caries arrest for SDF was 725% greater in a 24-month study and 100% greater than placebo in a 30-month study. No severe adverse effects were observed. This systematic review evaluates the use of SDF for both root caries prevention and arrest in older adults. Existing reports of SDF trials support effectiveness in root caries prevention and arrest, remineralization of deep occlusal lesions and treatment of hypersensitive dentin.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 214 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Postgraduate 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Researcher 10 5%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 80 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 55%
Materials Science 3 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Unspecified 2 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 81 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,050,072
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Gerodontology
#35
of 474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,011
of 320,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gerodontology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 474 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.