↓ Skip to main content

Seminal fluid and reproduction: much more than previously thought

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
patent
6 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
Seminal fluid and reproduction: much more than previously thought
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10815-014-0243-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

John J. Bromfield

Abstract

The influence of seminal plasma on the cytokine and immune uterine environment is well characterised in mice and humans, while the effects of disruption to uterine seminal plasma exposure on pregnancy and offspring health is becoming more clearly understood. The cellular and molecular environment of the uterus during the pre- and peri-implantation period of early pregnancy is critical for implantation success and optimal foetal and placental development. Perturbations to this environment not only have consequences for the success of pregnancy and neonatal health and viability, but can also drive adverse health outcomes in the offspring after birth, particularly the development of metabolic disorders such as obesity, hypertension and insulin resistance. It is now reported that an absence of seminal plasma at conception in mice promotes increased fat accumulation, altered metabolism and hypertension in offspring. The evidence reviewed here demonstrates that seminal plasma is not simply a transport medium for sperm, but acts also as a key regulator of the female tract environment providing optimal support for the developing embryo and benefiting future health of offspring.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 186 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 21%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 47 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 57 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,950,710
of 25,157,832 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#93
of 1,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,136
of 233,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,157,832 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.