You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can Physical Therapists Deliver a Pain Coping Skills Program? An Examination of Training Processes and Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Therapy, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2522/ptj.20130444 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina Bryant, Prudence Lewis, Kim L Bennell, Yasmin Ahamed, Denae Crough, Gwendolen A Jull, Justin Kenardy, Michael K Nicholas, Francis J Keefe |
| Abstract |
Physical therapists are well established as providers of treatments for common, painful and disabling conditions, such as knee osteoarthritis (OA). Thus, they are well placed to deliver treatments that integrate physical and psychosocial elements. Attention is usually given to outcomes of such programs, but few studies have examined the processes and outcomes of training physical therapists to deliver such treatments. This study describes the processes in training physical therapists to deliver a standardised pain coping skill treatment (PCST), and to evaluate the effectiveness of that training. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 32% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
| Scientists | 4 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 246 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 10% |
| Other | 44 | 17% |
| Unknown | 69 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 19% |
| Psychology | 18 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Unknown | 76 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,246,682
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Physical Therapy
#431
of 2,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,921
of 242,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Therapy
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.