↓ Skip to main content

The Yin and Yang of Bacterial Resilience in the Human Gut Microbiota

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Biology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Yin and Yang of Bacterial Resilience in the Human Gut Microbiota
Published in
Journal of Molecular Biology, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.05.029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Molly K. Gibson, Mitchell W. Pesesky, Gautam Dantas

Abstract

The human gut is home to trillions of microbes that form a symbiotic relationship with the human host. During health, the intestinal microbiota provides many benefits to the host and is generally resistant to colonization by new species; however, disruption of this complex community can lead to pathogen invasion, inflammation, and disease. Restoration and maintenance of a healthy gut microbiota composition requires effective therapies to reduce and prevent colonization of harmful bacteria (pathogens) while simultaneously promoting growth of beneficial bacteria (probiotics). Here we review the mechanisms by which the host modulates the gut community composition during health and disease, and discuss prospects for antibiotic and probiotic therapy for restoration of a healthy intestinal community following disruption.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 200 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Other 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 48 23%
Unknown 23 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 10%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 31 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2015.
All research outputs
#4,139,649
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Biology
#1,866
of 11,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,663
of 242,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Biology
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.