↓ Skip to main content

Population-specific common SNPs reflect demographic histories and highlight regions of genomic plasticity with functional relevance

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Population-specific common SNPs reflect demographic histories and highlight regions of genomic plasticity with functional relevance
Published in
BMC Genomics, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-437
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ananyo Choudhury, Scott Hazelhurst, Ayton Meintjes, Ovokeraye Achinike-Oduaran, Shaun Aron, Junaid Gamieldien, Mahjoubeh Jalali Sefid Dashti, Nicola Mulder, Nicki Tiffin, Michèle Ramsay

Abstract

Population differentiation is the result of demographic and evolutionary forces. Whole genome datasets from the 1000 Genomes Project (October 2012) provide an unbiased view of genetic variation across populations from Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas. Common population-specific SNPs (MAF > 0.05) reflect a deep history and may have important consequences for health and wellbeing. Their interpretation is contextualised by currently available genome data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 25%
Researcher 29 19%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 7%
Computer Science 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 30 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#14,832,116
of 24,862,067 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,313
of 11,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,059
of 234,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#81
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,067 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.