↓ Skip to main content

Climate model errors, feedbacks and forcings: a comparison of perturbed physics and multi-model ensembles

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
249 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Climate model errors, feedbacks and forcings: a comparison of perturbed physics and multi-model ensembles
Published in
Climate Dynamics, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00382-010-0808-0
Authors

Matthew Collins, Ben B. B. Booth, B. Bhaskaran, Glen R. Harris, James M. Murphy, David M. H. Sexton, Mark J. Webb

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 204 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 81 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 21%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 29 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 89 42%
Environmental Science 44 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Physics and Astronomy 7 3%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 36 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,231,785
of 23,437,201 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#1,272
of 5,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,687
of 96,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,437,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.