↓ Skip to main content

Dietary overlap of snow leopard and other carnivores in the Pamirs of Northwestern China

Overview of attention for article published in Science Bulletin, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Dietary overlap of snow leopard and other carnivores in the Pamirs of Northwestern China
Published in
Science Bulletin, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11434-014-0370-y
Authors

Jun Wang, Alice Laguardia, Peter John Damerell, Philip Riordan, Kun Shi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 48%
Environmental Science 18 23%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2014.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Science Bulletin
#1,251
of 1,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,349
of 242,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Bulletin
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.